OnlyCuffsOnlyCuffsarchive search
The Forum at Handcuffs.Org

Another protest in Birmingham, UK

31 visible archived posts · 31 preserved total · topic ID 1668
Original topic ↗Recovered images
Alan 12 Jan 2007
#1
There's been another protest at the Hiatts factory in Birmingham.

A report and some photos - lots of orange and a few of Hiatts finest handcuffs at http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/01/359752.html
Bounty Hunter 12 Jan 2007
#2
"....a UK company that makes shackles and other torture equipment." LOL

So many handcuff owners in the crowd. See all the Hiatts? Professional protesters like cuffs, too, I guess; just as long as they are not used to restrain terrrorists. Good for goose and gander.
Anonymous 12 Jan 2007
#3
There's been another protest at the Hiatts factory in Birmingham.

A report and some photos - lots of orange and a few of Hiatts finest handcuffs at http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/01/359752.html
give us advance warning next time so i can go down there with my flamethrower.
Anonymous 12 Jan 2007
#4
There's been another protest at the Hiatts factory in Birmingham.

A report and some photos - lots of orange and a few of Hiatts finest handcuffs at http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/01/359752.html
perhaps they should go join their brethren in gitmo.
cindi 12 Jan 2007
#5
There's been another protest at the Hiatts factory in Birmingham.

A report and some photos - lots of orange and a few of Hiatts finest handcuffs at http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/01/359752.html
Thanks for sharing that.
I like the Push up Photo. They could go for a record in the Leg Iron Olympics that I've recently created

Cindi
www.geocities.com/cindini_2000/escape.htm

cindi 12 Jan 2007
#6
There's been another protest at the Hiatts factory in Birmingham.

A report and some photos - lots of orange and a few of Hiatts finest handcuffs at http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/01/359752.html
BTW, I see they don't have chains or Irons on in their walk. Come on guys!
I just did a walk 5 miles in Irons. If they want to know torture that will do it! They need to display to the public what they protest
Get them Irons on!
C
monica 12 Jan 2007
#7
There's been another protest at the Hiatts factory in Birmingham.

A report and some photos - lots of orange and a few of Hiatts finest handcuffs at http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/01/359752.html
Cindi, 5 miles in leg irons? Cuffed, too? What were you....protesting?(-: Or proving that they aren't effective on a determined woman?
Howy 12 Jan 2007
#8
There's been another protest at the Hiatts factory in Birmingham.

A report and some photos - lots of orange and a few of Hiatts finest handcuffs at http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/01/359752.html
5 miles in the UK is not that far as they are on the metric system.

Miles here in the Colonies (USA States) are much longer and 5 US miles would be quite a piece to walk.

Chuckle, Chuckle

Howy
Cincy
Cindi 12 Jan 2007
#9
There's been another protest at the Hiatts factory in Birmingham.

A report and some photos - lots of orange and a few of Hiatts finest handcuffs at http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/01/359752.html
I used the Chicago Iron's on special, Not Hiatts

Here's the report from the St Augustine Record:
Cindini' sets new shackles record
By Paulette Perhach | More by this reporter | paulette.perhach@staugustinerecord.com | Posted: Thursday, December 28, 2006 ; Updated: 7:16 AM on Thursday, December 28, 2006
Anywhere else, people might have called the police.
But outside the Old Jail, onlookers simply looked and wondered at the sight of Cynthia Morrison, 47, shuffling along in a black shirt and striped jail pants, her legs shackled together to limit her stride to 16 inches.

"If I did this out on the beach, I knew there would probably be calls to the authorities," said Morrison, also known as the Great Cindini, an escapist.
That's why she came from her home in West Palm Beach to perform the feat in St. Augustine. Cindini made her Old Jail debut in March 2005 when she escaped from a straitjacket, chains and Victorian bird cage holding cell.

Wearing her old race car shoes (yes, she's been an autocross driver, and an alligator handler, and a jousting champion), she lapped the Old Jail 17 times Wednesday for a total of five miles in chains, a new world record according to the Record Holders Republic.
This totals 13 records for her with the UK-based organization, which rivals the Guinness Book of World Records. As far as Morrison is concerned, no one else has attempted the feat.
By the sixth lap, her feet went numb and her calves ached from the odd step. On breaks she propped her foot up to stretch.
"Ooh, ah, that feels better."
After her last record, the fastest one-mile run in leg irons, which she completed in 18 minutes and 34 seconds, she could barely walk for three days.
For this stunt, she added the padding of socks underneath the chains, which she ordered from discounthandcuffwarehouse.com, which offers 11 styles of leg irons ranging from $19.99 to $111.50.

With that one pair of socks separating her shin bone from the metal, Morrison walked more than 19,000 steps with every one stunted by the cinch of the chain.
"I sure am glad I don't have bloodhounds behind me," she said. "They would win."
Jerking along, Morrison completed her record in two hours and 22 minutes, by the end her feet went numb and her ankles went raw.
"The last two laps were absolute torture," she said.
monica 12 Jan 2007
#10
There's been another protest at the Hiatts factory in Birmingham.

A report and some photos - lots of orange and a few of Hiatts finest handcuffs at http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/01/359752.html
I guess marathons are not in my future.
Bruce Thomson 12 Jan 2007
#11
There's been another protest at the Hiatts factory in Birmingham.

A report and some photos - lots of orange and a few of Hiatts finest handcuffs at http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/01/359752.html
These morons really bug my...
I wonder what kind of cake it was? Seems a shame to let good frosting go to waste.
Stan Willis 12 Jan 2007
#12
There's been another protest at the Hiatts factory in Birmingham.

A report and some photos - lots of orange and a few of Hiatts finest handcuffs at http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/01/359752.html
I don't think I would trust a cake that a protestor left at my door. Going after Hiatt is like going after match manufacturers if you are against smoking. I'm sure Hiatt contributes something to the local economy. If they don't sell cuffs, then the production will increase for the US, or Korea or China, or any of the other cuff manufacturing countries.
Alan 13 Jan 2007
#13
There's been another protest at the Hiatts factory in Birmingham.

A report and some photos - lots of orange and a few of Hiatts finest handcuffs at http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/01/359752.html
I doubt the cake went to waste - I'm sure the protesters ate it.

There was a similar demonstration outside the US embassy in London on Thursday.
http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/01/359734.html
Brad Darling 13 Jan 2007
#14
There's been another protest at the Hiatts factory in Birmingham.

A report and some photos - lots of orange and a few of Hiatts finest handcuffs at http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/01/359752.html
Alan,

When we say "Indy" around here we all think of a great place for a collector's show. This Indy you might want to add some space between it and yourself.

The people writing at that place have been eating too many of the wrong vegetables. They need more soluble fiber and less of whatever the chemical is that is contained in whatever it is they eating there. What a creep show.

Try www.foxnews.com

Brad
Anonymous 13 Jan 2007
#15
There's been another protest at the Hiatts factory in Birmingham.

A report and some photos - lots of orange and a few of Hiatts finest handcuffs at http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/01/359752.html
I always read about Amnesty International and was under the opinion that they were trying to make good in the world and right the wrongs of governments that are intolerant and evil. I really thought of them as intelegent and beneficial.
I missed the boat on this one. I lost all respect for them.
They say you can't judge people from the outward appearance, but these idiots are the exception.
Anonymous 13 Jan 2007
#16
There's been another protest at the Hiatts factory in Birmingham.

A report and some photos - lots of orange and a few of Hiatts finest handcuffs at http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/01/359752.html
Let them eat cake. In jail.
Alan 13 Jan 2007
#17
There's been another protest at the Hiatts factory in Birmingham.

A report and some photos - lots of orange and a few of Hiatts finest handcuffs at http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/01/359752.html
Brad

Anyone can post to indymedia and this is reflected in the quality of most of the content. This item is one of the better ones. This protest was also reported on the BBC website and made TV news in the West Midlands. I chose the Indymedia report because it contained more photos.

I would have preferred Hiatts to have accepted the cake and to have said how proud they were to play a part in the global war on terror. But the police advise against doing that sort of thing.

I know this protest won't meet with universal approval here, but think it is newsworthy.

And Anonymous - they won't be eating cake in jail - they were not breaking the law.

Regards

Alan




Anonymous 13 Jan 2007
#18
There's been another protest at the Hiatts factory in Birmingham.

A report and some photos - lots of orange and a few of Hiatts finest handcuffs at http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/01/359752.html
Hiatts presumably do contribute to the local economy by employing skilled metalworkers to make their products, as well as the people who design them and the associated admin staff. They also contribute to British society by being the manufacturer of the handcuffs used by virtually all of our police forces.

Of course, Indymedia don't like the police using handcuffs either, probably because whenever they mention them they're being used on the Indymedia reporters who haven't yet realised that a good way to avoid being arrested during a lawful protest is to refrain from breaking the law...
Dorson 13 Jan 2007
#19
There's been another protest at the Hiatts factory in Birmingham.

A report and some photos - lots of orange and a few of Hiatts finest handcuffs at http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/01/359752.html
What gets me is they don't pick on TKS or Chubb which are smaller companies that makes restraints. And they are picking on easy targets that have little or nothing to do with the real problem. Typical stupid thinking in today's world. Would they prefer to go back to like how the Japanese used to do it with rope? Can you see it now, tying up a criminal and hauling them off to jail... Then you would hear them protesting that they don't use something better or some other silly nonsense... And about amnesty Int'l, there is a screw loose in that organization who has something against restraints.

-Dorson
Anonymous 13 Jan 2007
#20
There's been another protest at the Hiatts factory in Birmingham.

A report and some photos - lots of orange and a few of Hiatts finest handcuffs at http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/01/359752.html
Trespassing, creating a public nuisance/disturbance (a live band and loudspeaker rants in front of the entrance!!!), blocking a public throroughfare, harassment, slander/defamation and more....plenty of laws being broken. It's just that the police (and England) are so in the grips of PC that they don't do anything but stand around and take pics.
Alan 13 Jan 2007
#21
There's been another protest at the Hiatts factory in Birmingham.

A report and some photos - lots of orange and a few of Hiatts finest handcuffs at http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/01/359752.html
Anonymous - In the UK we enjoy freedom of speech and freedom of assembly. It is usual to notify the police in advance (which I'm sure happened in this case) and if the planned protest is reasonable they rarely object. When the police do object to a protest and are unable to reach an agreement with the organisers the matter tends to be decided in the courts. The police usually advise residents and businesses who will be affected by a protest in advance.
As you see from the photos, the police attended, no offences were committed and no arrests were made.

Any trespass was minimal (and is not a criminal offence in England). The noise did not give rise to public nuisance - if they planned to demonstrate for weeks and weeks that would be a different matter. The road was closed by the police for a short period to allow the demonstration to go ahead safely. You can't harrass a company as it is incapable of being caused alarm or distress (and harrassment requires a course of conduct ie more than one occasion), and slander and defamation if they occurred are matters for the civil courts and not the police. Just because many people (probably the majority) here disagree with the protesters does not alter the fact that it was a lawful protest and does not diminish the protesters rights to free speech.


Dawson - I think the reason they target Hiatts is that they supply the US armed forces and their equipment is used at Guantánamo Bay. Is Chubb really smaller that Hiatts? I thought Chubb was huge, but that custodial products were only a very small part of their business. I know that they no longer make locks and safes, but licence the name to Assa Abloy and Gunnebo.
Anonymous 13 Jan 2007
#22
There's been another protest at the Hiatts factory in Birmingham.

A report and some photos - lots of orange and a few of Hiatts finest handcuffs at http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/01/359752.html
Speech is 'free" until it imposes on others. Your viewpoint - the viewpoint of a vitriolic, simple-minded protester - is not law. Try that stunt around my busines and you'll get a comeuppance in spades that would effectively end your career as a whinging POM. Bet on it.
BH 13 Jan 2007
#23
There's been another protest at the Hiatts factory in Birmingham.

A report and some photos - lots of orange and a few of Hiatts finest handcuffs at http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/01/359752.html
Protesters, sympathizers and support of terrorism are no better than the terrorists. In fact, they are one and the same. They belong in Gitmo, too. Enlarge Gitmo now!
Jack.Tanis 13 Jan 2007
#24
There's been another protest at the Hiatts factory in Birmingham.

A report and some photos - lots of orange and a few of Hiatts finest handcuffs at http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/01/359752.html
Amnesty International:

About Amnesty International


Amnesty International (AI) is a worldwide movement of people who campaign for internationally recognized human rights.

AI’s vision is of a world in which every person enjoys all of the human rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human rights standards.

In pursuit of this vision, AI’s mission is to undertake research and action focused on preventing and ending grave abuses of the rights to physical and mental integrity, freedom of conscience and expression, and freedom from discrimination, within the context of its work to promote all human rights.

AI is independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion. It does not support or oppose any government or political system, nor does it support or oppose the views of the victims whose rights it seeks to protect. It is concerned solely with the impartial protection of human rights.

AI has a varied network of members and supporters around the world. At the latest count, there were more than 1.8 million members, supporters and subscribers in over 150 countries and territories in every region of the world. Although they come from many different backgrounds and have widely different political and religious beliefs, they are united by a determination to work for a world where everyone enjoys human rights.

AI is a democratic, self-governing movement. Major policy decisions are taken by an International Council made up of representatives from all national sections.

AI’s national sections and local volunteer groups are primarily responsible for funding the movement. No funds are sought or accepted from governments for AI’s work investigating and campaigning against human rights violations.

Amnesty International

Universal Declaration of Human Rights


Adopted and proclaimed by General Assembly Resolution 217 A (III) of 10 December 1948

Preamble

Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world,

Whereas disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of mankind, and the advent of a world in which human beings shall enjoy freedom of speech and belief and freedom from fear and want has been proclaimed as the highest aspiration of the common people,

Whereas it is essential, if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression, that human rights should be protected by the rule of law,

Whereas it is essential to promote the development of friendly relations between nations,

Whereas the peoples of the United Nations have in the Charter reaffirmed their faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person and in the equal rights of men and women and have determined to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedoms,

Whereas member States have pledged themselves to achieve, in co-operation with the United Nations, the promotion of universal respect for and observance of human rights and fundamental freedoms,

Whereas a common understanding of these rights and freedoms is of the greatest importance for the full realization of this pledge,

Now therefore,

The General Assembly

Proclaims this Universal Declaration of Human Rights as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations, to the end that every individual and every organ of society, keeping this Declaration constantly in mind, shall strive by teaching and education to promote respect for these rights and freedoms and by progressive measures, national and international, to secure their universal and effective recognition and observance, both among the peoples of member States themselves and among the peoples of territories under their jurisdiction.

Article 1

All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.

Article 2

1. Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status.

2. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty.

Article 3

Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.

Article 4

No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms.

Article 5

No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

Article 6

Everyone has the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law.

Article 7

All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination.

Article 8

Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law.

Article 9

No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile.

Article 10

Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him.

Article 11

1. Everyone charged with a penal offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law in a public trial at which he has had all the guarantees necessary for his defence.

2. No one shall be held guilty of any penal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a penal offence, under national or international law, at the time when it was committed. Nor shall a heavier penalty be imposed than the one that was applicable at the time the penal offence was committed.

Article 12

No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.

Article 13

1. Everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the borders of each State.

2. Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country.

Article 14

1. Everyone has the right to seek and to enjoy in other countries asylum from persecution.

2. This right may not be invoked in the case of prosecutions genuinely arising from non-political crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.

Article 15

1. Everyone has the right to a nationality.

2. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his nationality nor denied the right to change his nationality.

Article 16

1. Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution.

2. Marriage shall be entered into only with free and full consent of the intending spouses.

3. The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the State.

Article 17

1. Everyone has the right to own property alone as well as in association with others.

2. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property.

Article 18

Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.

Article 19

Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.

Article 20

1. Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association.

2. No one may be compelled to belong to an association.

Article 21

1. Everyone has the right to take part in the government of his country, directly or through freely chosen representatives.

2. Everyone has the right to equal access to public service in his country.

3. The will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of government; this will shall be expressed in periodic and genuine elections which shall be by universal and equal suffrage and shall be held by secret vote or by equivalent free voting procedures.

Article 22

Everyone, as a member of society, has the right to social security and is entitled to realization, through national effort and international co-operation and in accordance with the organization and resources of each State, of the economic, social and cultural rights indispensable for his dignity and the free development of his personality.

Article 23

1. Everyone has the right to work, to free choice of employment, to just and favourable conditions of work and to protection against unemployment.

2. Everyone, without any discrimination, has the right to equal pay for equal work.

3. Everyone who works has the right to just and favourable remuneration ensuring for himself and his family an existence worthy of human dignity, and supplemented, if necessary, by other means of social protection.

4. Everyone has the right to form and to join trade unions for the protection of his interests.

Article 24

Everyone has the right to rest and leisure, including reasonable limitation of working hours and periodic holidays with pay.

Article 25

1. Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control.

2. Motherhood and childhood are entitled to special care and assistance. All children, whether born in or out of wedlock, shall enjoy the same social protection.

Article 26

1. Everyone has the right to education. Education shall be free, at least in the elementary and fundamental stages. Elementary education shall be compulsory. Technical and professional education shall be made generally available and higher education shall be equally accessible to all on the basis of merit.

2. Education shall be directed to the full development of the human personality and to the strengthening of respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms. It shall promote understanding, tolerance and friendship among all nations, racial or religious groups, and shall further the activities of the United Nations for the maintenance of peace.

3. Parents have a prior right to choose the kind of education that shall be given to their children.

Article 27

1. Everyone has the right freely to participate in the cultural life of the community, to enjoy the arts and to share in scientific advancement and its benefits.

2. Everyone has the right to the protection of the moral and material interests resulting from any scientific, literary or artistic production of which he is the author.

Article 28

Everyone is entitled to a social and international order in which the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration can be fully realized.

Article 29

1. Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible.

2. In the exercise of his rights and freedoms, everyone shall be subject only to such limitations as are determined by law solely for the purpose of securing due recognition and respect for the rights and freedoms of others and of meeting the just requirements of morality, public order and the general welfare in a democratic society.

3. These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.

Article 30

Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein.

Cheers,

Jack
http://www.editing.org.uk/tanis/collectibles.htm
Anonymous 13 Jan 2007
#25
There's been another protest at the Hiatts factory in Birmingham.

A report and some photos - lots of orange and a few of Hiatts finest handcuffs at http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/01/359752.html
amnesty int'l is a terrorist org.
Jack.Tanis 13 Jan 2007
#26
There's been another protest at the Hiatts factory in Birmingham.

A report and some photos - lots of orange and a few of Hiatts finest handcuffs at http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/01/359752.html
In his book Inside Terrorism, Bruce Hoffman wrote, in Chapter One: Defining Terrorism:

"On one point, at least, everyone agrees: terrorism is a pejorative term. It is a word with intrinsically negative connotations that is generally applied to one's enemies and opponents, or to those with whom one disagrees and would otherwise prefer to ignore. `What is called terrorism', Brian Jenkins has written, `thus seems to depend on one's point of view. Use of the term implies a moral judgment; and if one party can successfully attach the label terrorist to its opponent, then it has indirectly persuaded others to adopt its moral viewpoint.' Hence the decision to call someone or label some organization `terrorist' becomes almost unavoidably subjective, depending largely on whether one sympathizes with or opposes the person/group/cause concerned."

Anonymous, please stay that way.

Cheers,

Jack
http://www.editing.org.uk/tanis/collectibles.htm
Unknown / guest 14 Jan 2007
#27
There's been another protest at the Hiatts factory in Birmingham.

A report and some photos - lots of orange and a few of Hiatts finest handcuffs at http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/01/359752.html
In his book Inside Terrorism, Bruce Hoffman wrote, in Chapter One: Defining Terrorism:

"On one point, at least, everyone agrees: terrorism is a pejorative term. It is a word with intrinsically negative connotations that is generally applied to one's enemies and opponents, or to those with whom one disagrees and would otherwise prefer to ignore. `What is called terrorism', Brian Jenkins has written, `thus seems to depend on one's point of view. Use of the term implies a moral judgment; and if one party can successfully attach the label terrorist to its opponent, then it has indirectly persuaded others to adopt its moral viewpoint.' Hence the decision to call someone or label some organization `terrorist' becomes almost unavoidably subjective, depending largely on whether one sympathizes with or opposes the person/group/cause concerned."

Anonymous, please stay that way.

Cheers,

Jack
http://www.editing.org.uk/tanis/collectibles.htm
Unknown / guest 14 Jan 2007
#28
There's been another protest at the Hiatts factory in Birmingham.

A report and some photos - lots of orange and a few of Hiatts finest handcuffs at http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/01/359752.html
In his book Inside Terrorism, Bruce Hoffman wrote, in Chapter One: Defining Terrorism:

"On one point, at least, everyone agrees: terrorism is a pejorative term. It is a word with intrinsically negative connotations that is generally applied to one's enemies and opponents, or to those with whom one disagrees and would otherwise prefer to ignore. `What is called terrorism', Brian Jenkins has written, `thus seems to depend on one's point of view. Use of the term implies a moral judgment; and if one party can successfully attach the label terrorist to its opponent, then it has indirectly persuaded others to adopt its moral viewpoint.' Hence the decision to call someone or label some organization `terrorist' becomes almost unavoidably subjective, depending largely on whether one sympathizes with or opposes the person/group/cause concerned."

Anonymous, please stay that way.

Cheers,

Jack
http://www.editing.org.uk/tanis/collectibles.htm
Anonymous 14 Jan 2007
#29
There's been another protest at the Hiatts factory in Birmingham.

A report and some photos - lots of orange and a few of Hiatts finest handcuffs at http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/01/359752.html
Not a Clue! I am stuck at the word pejorative
Anonymous 14 Jan 2007
#30
There's been another protest at the Hiatts factory in Birmingham.

A report and some photos - lots of orange and a few of Hiatts finest handcuffs at http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/01/359752.html
LOL.

Out of university, I had a friend who went the way of trying to make the world a better place. After a long recruitment period, she went to work with AI and learned after a few months on the job that their agenda was driven by an overwhelming hate for America and like-minded countries. Dictators, despots and terrorists were called freedom fighters and liberators and political leaders from democratic countries were called aggressors, imperialists and colonizers, et al. They might not have blown anything up, but the were very much of the same mind as terrorists and serve, to this day, as an arm of propaganda. Stay who you are, Jack. Know thy enemy. And, carry a big stick.
Anonymous 15 Jan 2007
#31
There's been another protest at the Hiatts factory in Birmingham.

A report and some photos - lots of orange and a few of Hiatts finest handcuffs at http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/01/359752.html
These people are nuts!!!!!! The story about the guy getting beaten with ax handles everytime he fell asleep cause he was on his tip toes all day was a classic. Some people pay good money to be handcuffed and beaten.
What a chump!
He even gave the cuffs back!
I would have atleast listed them on ebay!