OnlyCuffsOnlyCuffsarchive search
The Forum at Handcuffs.Org

Peerless Lightweight

15 visible archived posts · 15 preserved total · topic ID 2352
Original topic ↗Recovered images
Brian 15 Dec 2007
#1
Is this for real?

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... :IT&ih=017

If it is a lightweight, shouldn't it be made out of aluminum and not steel?
Observer 15 Dec 2007
#2
These Peerless handcuffs are described correctly since they are nickel plated carbon steel in a thinner 7 ounce version verses the thicker 10 ounce model. These were I believe refered to as a detective model too.

If they were made out of aluminum they would weigh approximately 4.5 ounces.
Franklin 15 Dec 2007
#3
Is this for real?

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... :IT&ih=017

If it is a lightweight, shouldn't it be made out of aluminum and not steel?
Brian:

A while back, I had an interesting conversation with a retired cop buddy. It seems that in the 1950s, with all of their operative patents having expired, Peerless came out with a new line of products, all of which bombed out. While not an official Peerless designation, it was the Model 4, which had a different lock mechanism than the Model 3 which had been in production since about 1932. Originally, the Model 4 had a double-bitted key which they quickly abandoned since cops were using a standard key and breaking the lock. Peerless then came out with an aluminum alloy cuff, the same dimensions as the standard 10 oz. steel cuff, but less than half the weight. Well, cops didn't care much for this one since it didn't have enough "heft" to it. Peerless then tried a thinned down version of their standard cuff, using the Model 4 lock mechanism, weighing in at 7 oz.

Due to problems with the lock mechanism, Peerless abandoned the Model 4 entirely and went back to the old Model 3. However, they continued manufacturing the 7 oz. thin model using the Model 3 lock mechanism. From the stampings in the auction you referenced, that cuff is a Model 3 thin version. Real easy to tell the difference. If it were a Model 4, it would have a patent number of 2,759,349; if a Model 3, it has the two patent numbers 1531451 and 1872857 (even though these patents had expired, it seems Peerless continued to stamp them on their cuffs for marketing purposes).

On the boxes the thin model came in (both Model 4 and Model 3), it was called "Lightweight" and the printing wss all in red ink, rather than black ink.

The 7 oz. thin model was eventually discontinued due to poor sales. From what my buddy said, the difference in weight didn't amount to much and the thinner plates were more likely to cause wrist injuries with aggressive prisoners.

While not perhaps all that popular among police officers from that time, the thin model is very well made and makes a nice addition to a collection.
Stan Willis 15 Dec 2007
#4
Is this for real?

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... :IT&ih=017

If it is a lightweight, shouldn't it be made out of aluminum and not steel?
Very interesting!
Does anyone have the model 4 with the double bitted key or the thin version model 4 ?
Stan

Stan Willis 15 Dec 2007
#5
Is this for real?

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... :IT&ih=017

If it is a lightweight, shouldn't it be made out of aluminum and not steel?
Another easy way to identify a model 4 Peerless is that the double locking button is square instead of round.
Stan

The Amazing Michael 15 Dec 2007
#6
Is this for real?

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... :IT&ih=017

If it is a lightweight, shouldn't it be made out of aluminum and not steel?
I, too, would like to see the double bitted Peerless....never knew it existed! Cool!

Cheers, Mike
Franklin 15 Dec 2007
#7
Is this for real?

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... :IT&ih=017

If it is a lightweight, shouldn't it be made out of aluminum and not steel?
Hi Stan:

The Model 4 had a round double-lock button. The Model 400 had a square one.

This whole model thing gets confusing with Peerless products, and what collectors call things as opposed to what the manufacturer does. You probably are aware of most of what follows, but others may not.

Until the NIJ standards were adopted, Peerless never used model numbers; they just called them "handcuffs."

As best I know, starting with Dick Norman, the original Peerless cuff using a bit key that double-locked with the key was called, among collectors, Model 1. The next lock mechanism, using a bit key but with a double-lock button was Model 2. The next lock mechanism, using a barrel key and button double-lock was called Model 3. When the 2,759,349 lock mechanism was introduced in the 1950s, it was, at the time among collectors, called the "New" model, which with the passage of time, began to be called Model 4.

And that's where it gets confusing. Production-wise, it went from Model 1 to Model 2 to Model 3 to Model 4 then back to Model 3. However, all of these had the round double-lock button.

With the Model 3 being back in production on the second go around, the NIJ standards were then introduced which required that handcuffs be stamped with a model number. So, Peerless denominated the standard chain handcuff the Model 300, and the hinged version (using the Model 3 lock mechanism) as Model 301 and began stamping them as such.

When Peerless came out with the flash in the pan scintered steel handcuff and lock mechanism with a square double-lock button, that got denominated as the Model 400. When they went back to the old way of manufacturing using rivets to hold the cuff body together, it was denominated the Model 500.

There was a Model 600, but it never went into production beyond the prototype stage.

http://www.network54.com/Forum/261154/m ... +handcuffs

When the raised rivet design came along, Peerless called it the Model 700.
Stan Willis 15 Dec 2007
#8
Is this for real?

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... :IT&ih=017

If it is a lightweight, shouldn't it be made out of aluminum and not steel?
Evidently I can't read very well. You are correct about the model 4 vs. 400, but the way I read the sequence of the cuffs in your first writeup, I assumed you meant the model 400. So now I would like to find someone who has the model 4 with the double bitted key. This is the first time i've heard about them.
anonymous 007 15 Dec 2007
#9
Is this for real?

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... :IT&ih=017

If it is a lightweight, shouldn't it be made out of aluminum and not steel?
All of the Peerless 7 oz. lightweight handcuffs that I
have owned had a five digit serial number vs six on the
standard 10 oz. model.
lauher 15 Dec 2007
#10
Is this for real?

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... :IT&ih=017

If it is a lightweight, shouldn't it be made out of aluminum and not steel?
The Peerless Model 4 is the one that Dick Norman calls the "new" model in his handcuff articles. He shows the double bitted key. I know of at least one aluminum model 4 with the slotted key.

The model 1, 2 and 3 designations come from Dick Norman. He does not mention the what I call the "Patent Model"


Patent Model Looks like the patent drawing with curved lock case. With long link.

Model 1 had the double lock via key (flat key) Has long link or two short links

Model 2 had the double lock via plunger button (flat key)

Model 3 round key. The first "modern Peerless"

Model 4 called "new model" by Dick Norman. Introduced in 1950 and withdrawn soon after. Model 3 then made a come back.


Joe
Brian 16 Dec 2007
#11
Is this for real?

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... :IT&ih=017

If it is a lightweight, shouldn't it be made out of aluminum and not steel?
Thanks to all of you.

I am more confused now than when I started.
Anonymous 16 Dec 2007
#12
Is this for real?

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... :IT&ih=017

If it is a lightweight, shouldn't it be made out of aluminum and not steel?
The lightweight Peerless sound a lot like the lightweight Hiatt 2222s that they just released. I suspect the Hiatts will likewise not be popular.
Franklin 16 Dec 2007
#13
Is this for real?

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... :IT&ih=017

If it is a lightweight, shouldn't it be made out of aluminum and not steel?
Joe: I think we're all trying to sing on the same page, we're just reading the individual notes a little differently. As I understand, the denominations of Models 1, 2, 3 all relate to the lock mechanism employed. In that sense, and not to be obdurate, it seems what you are calling the Patent Model, the very first Peerless cuff, could be deemed a variation of the Model 1 since it used the bit key to double lock, rather than an independent button. However, when you get to Model 4, this theory kinda falls apart since it seems the lock mechanism changed, starting out with a double-bitted key then switching back to a single-bit key.

Brian: Don't give up hope. All this confusion is what collecting is all about. The wonderful thing about this forum is that it brings together people from all over the world to share their thoughts and collections with one another. So hop in and join the fun. Plus, if you have a spouse, it will give her/him something else to gripe about.

And if anyone out there can unravel the eternal mystery of just how Peerless serial numbers work, I'll be happy to remember you in my last will and testament.
lauher 16 Dec 2007
#14
Is this for real?

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... :IT&ih=017

If it is a lightweight, shouldn't it be made out of aluminum and not steel?
Franklin

You are correct that the cuff I call the "Patent Model" has the same lock mechanism as Dick Norman's Model 1.

Since it has such a distinctive shape I simply think it deserves its own designator. Calling it the Patent Model seems more descriptive than "Model 0", a designation I have seen others use. We could also so the "Patent Version" of the Model 1.

We should remember that Peerless never used any of these model designators.

Joe

Joseph Fox 17 Dec 2007
#15
Is this for real?

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... :IT&ih=017

If it is a lightweight, shouldn't it be made out of aluminum and not steel?
This same subject was addressed on this Forum from last Dec. 2006 through Jan. 2007. --here is one example from a year ago:
____________________________________________________________________
for Joe Fox
January 1 2007 at 5:18 PM Ian McColl


Response to Peerless Aluminum Cuffs For Sale

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi Joe, I have worked on one only pair of light weight cuffs with the warded pawl. The ward comes into play after the deadlock has been pressed. The lever is forced up at one end by the deadlock indent plunger ( within the cuff) and this moves the other end of the lever into position. The key requires the ward cut in the middle to bypass the lever and allow the deadlock to be disabled. The cuff I saw and handled is owned by an America collector.
(so there is at least one out there and the article was not fiction)
regards

Ian