Steve Santini 21 Nov 2008
#7Do their locks have a reputation for malfunctioning? I have 2 pair, both in outwardly superb condition and, on separate occasions, I've gotten stuck in each pair. The keys became useless (if not part of the problem?). For fear of knowing the outcome, I've double-locked them and put them away, never to be closed around my wrists again. Yes, I know, operator error..... (-; Anyone else have similar
Hi,
IMHO, the Mattatuck cuffs, are if anything, too simplistic in the number of moving parts and the latitude these have for "wandering" inside the lock case.
There is the rotating disc, the bolt, and 2 springs.
And all of these are housed in a frame with internal guides that are anything but precision.
The fact that the bolt when thrown from the cocked or "armed" position is only stopped by a cut out in it's assembly slamming up hard against the key post is not good and tends to cause the post to become loose and "float" or move from side to side a bit.
And, another problem with the deisgn is that the "tooth" or "pawl" end of the bolt assembly is made from folding over a sheet of metal to make the single triangle shaped locking pawl.
I have seen Mattatucks where after repeated useage the area of this fold has weakened and in fact cracked off, leaving a small bit of metal drifting around in the lock case where it can eventually find it's way the rear of the lock case by the bow arm hinge and get lodged in the spot where the bolt assembly drops down into the cocked position when the cuff is unlocked.
When this happens the key rotated disc cannot pull the bolt far enough back to execute unlocking and the cuff is in effect jammed in the locked position.
Yes indeed, there are a lot more problems to be found with the Mattatuck design than just a keyhole disc that may rotate on it's own out of sinc with the keyway.
Sloppy tollerances and cheaply manufactured internal parts also plague this design.
Steve Santini