OnlyCuffsOnlyCuffsarchive search
The Forum at Handcuffs.Org

William V. Adams

11 visible archived posts · 11 preserved total · topic ID 7143
Original topic ↗Recovered images
Matt3114 22 Feb 2021
#1
We know William V. Adams as the first person to receive a handcuff patent which was adjustable for wrist size. He received this patent (35,576) on June 17, 1862.  While many inventors of handcuffs had backgrounds in policing or lock making, Adams did not. He was a lamp manufacturer. He resided in New York City and was not a lone artisan, but a very successful business man. He had contracts with the Us.S. Navy to furnish supplies for the Washington Navy Yard in the 1850's  and in 1856 supplied the State of New York with pier and bulkhead lamps to the tune of $3,010. 
    I have no idea how he came to invent a handcuff, since this has no relation to his occupation, but to our benefit he did.  In 2007 in the Handcuff Forum there was an interesting discussion about Adams handcuff patent dates.  While some cuffs had the June 17, 1862 date stamped on them, others had an 1864 date. This was a re-issue date. It appears Adams assigned his patent to a George W. Reed. The patent papers are titled "George W. Reed, Of New York, N.Y., Assignee of Wm. V. Adams of Same Place." The patent is dated April 5, 1864. 
    I have not been able to find any information about George Reed, but I did come across an interesting piece in the 45th. Congress, House of Representatives Report No. 182, published on March 3, 1879. The House considered a bill for the relief of George Reeds widow, Olivia C. Reed.  The report reads in part, "On the 17th. of June, 1862, a patent for an improvement in handcuffs was granted to William V. Adams, of New York, who made an assignment of same to George W. Reed, of New York on the 5th. April, 1864"
"Mrs. Olivia C. Reed makes affidavit that her husband died just as he began to realize an income from his patent. For three years thereafter the patent was dormant. During the past four years she has received between $1,200 and $1,500 from this patent, and almost half the amount during the past year. 
Now here is an interesting sentence: "We find, that the patent of W.H. Kimball. issued August, 1860, and now expired by limitation, should have covered the claim of George W. Reed" I have no idea how Kimball gets involved.

Matt
lauher 22 Feb 2021
#2
Matt
I think they are simply saying that the Adams patent should not have been issued, because it offered nothing new over the Kimball patent.
That is really interesting, but it does not really make much sense since the Adams patent introduced the ratchet, multiple size idea.
Joe
larry 24 Feb 2021
#3
Matt can you elaborate more on the date April 5,1964  was it stamped on any cuffs?
larry 24 Feb 2021
#4
Matt were there any cuffs stamped with the patent date April 5,1864 ?
larry 24 Feb 2021
#5
Matt were there any cuffs stamped with patent date April 5,1864?
larry 24 Feb 2021
#6
larry wrote: ↑
Feb 24, 2021
Matt can you elaborate more on the date April 5,1964  was it stamped on any cuffs?
sorry i ment 1864
Matt3114 24 Feb 2021
#7
Larry
I was wrong in stating that some had the 1864 date stamped on them. I confused the correct April 5, 1864 patent re-issue date with information posted on the Forum in 2007 about an April 24th. date. Sorry for the confusion, I guess that's what happens when you are 76 years old.

Matt
larry 24 Feb 2021
#8
Matt thank you for the reply , the patent date ( April 24,1862 ) was going to be my next question , I was in that discussion and I have one of those stamped cuffs. the year date is 1862  not 1864 so those cuffs would be before the date the patent office granted Adams his June 17,1862 patent. I think that April 24 was when Adams either sent off the request or filed it! I enjoy your search's and if you could do one on Adams I would like to see it . I have also heard  that the Adams in the Folgers / Adams jail locks was W.V. Adams grandson! I understand about the 76 confusion as I am now 71  LOL   oh also I am not a rebot!
LK D~D
Matt3114 25 Feb 2021
#9
Larry

While later patents, such as the Herrmann Ahrend patent of April 1, 1873 included the date the patent was filed (in this case November 22, 1872), earlier patents, including the Adams had no filing date. It is possible that the April 24, 1862 date was the filing date, but patent office records do not list it on the patent papers. One could try to contact the patent office and attempt to find out if the filing date of patents issued in the 1860's were recorded in some ledger they might have even though it was not recorded on the patent itself.

Matt
Unknown / guest 25 Feb 2021
#10
Larry

I just contacted the U.S. Patent Office and they were not able to provide me with filing dates from 1860's patents, so that seems like a dead end.

Matt
larry 27 Feb 2021
#11
Matt thank you