PaulJDavies
#1I'm curious to know how many of these exist. I'm pretty sure John Bushey had one and a photo of a Hiatt display also had one.
I suspect they were experimental in nature and were not worth continuing. Obviously making the extra hinge was more work and there is more movement of the bow. The extra 'play' in the bow means the alignment did not need to be perfect to engage the lock, but would that also make them easier to break because they were less rigid? The lock tube is cast I believe, and everything else is blacksmith made. The lock tubes are very short and use a short handcuff width key. I have found that early leg irons use handcuff size keys. All hinges are folded straps and the clevis pierces a strap also holding it together. There are no stampings on them at all and the finish makes me think they are quite early. Can anyone add anything more about these leg irons? Paul
I suspect they were experimental in nature and were not worth continuing. Obviously making the extra hinge was more work and there is more movement of the bow. The extra 'play' in the bow means the alignment did not need to be perfect to engage the lock, but would that also make them easier to break because they were less rigid? The lock tube is cast I believe, and everything else is blacksmith made. The lock tubes are very short and use a short handcuff width key. I have found that early leg irons use handcuff size keys. All hinges are folded straps and the clevis pierces a strap also holding it together. There are no stampings on them at all and the finish makes me think they are quite early. Can anyone add anything more about these leg irons? Paul
